Monday, June 23, 2008

Monday Hodgepodge

A few things to get your week started.

  1. Who’s to blame for America’s energy crisis? Find the answer here. Democrats have stood in the way of America being energy independent since the 70’s. Can Americans hope to see lower energy costs under Obama? Nope, just more of the same. The above link is today’s must read.

  2. The Justices of the Supreme Court are meeting as I write this. The top question on this conservatives mind is how they end up ruling on District of Columbia v. Heller. It is the first ruling on the 2nd Amendment since 1939. And after the ruling last week that gave foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay constitutional rights, I’m a little nervous.

  3. Krazy Democrat Watch: Congressman Dave Loebsack was obviously focused on his consitiuents when President Bush visited Cedar Rapids last week. Here is a little blurb from the New York Times about Loebsack:

“So far, so good,” he said, clutching his packet of giveaways from Air Force One, including M&M candies in boxes that bear the presidential seal. But, fresh from the president’s hospitality, the congressman demurred on the question of whether Mr. Bush’s visit to his district could repair the damage done by Hurricane Katrina.”

Really, he’s grabbing free M&M’s? At least Sen. Wally Horn would have said “Show is Democrats the Money.” This is just embarrassing.

4 comments:

  1. Loebsack wants some sweet M&M's? Tell him he's got a feisty M&M coming his way by the name of Miller Meeks!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well Krusty, I've been ruminating om your posting since shortly after you put it up this morning.

    Did the New York Times really print this:

    “So far, so good,” he said, clutching his packet of giveaways from Air Force One, including M&M candies in boxes that bear the presidential seal. But, fresh from the president’s hospitality, the congressman demurred on the question of whether Mr. Bush’s visit to his district could repair the damage done by Hurricane Katrina.”

    And who in the world at the NYT wrote this article? They honestly believe Iowa was hit by Katrina?

    FGS!!

    It's become harder and harder to take the Main Stream Media seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think what they're saying is that Bush's response to the Iowa flooding could help repair the damage done to the Bush administration during Hurricane Katrina in '05.

    Don't get me wrong, I think NYT reporters are capable of superhuman feats of stupidity, but I think this is just a convoluted phrase.

    (Russ from Winterset)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did the Supreme Court ever make a decision on D.C. v. Heller? I haven't been able to find anything about it in the news.

    ReplyDelete