I don’t see what people like David Yepsen see in Becky Greenwald. I mean if you want a partisan attack dog, vote for her. But if you want someone who will represent you well in Congress, I think you better stick with what you have. Greenwald is a light weight.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow. Everyone should send 10 dollars to Tom Latham just to send this woman a message.
ReplyDeleteLightweight is not a would I would have choosen to describe her
ReplyDeletemeow
Wow...
ReplyDeleteWhere do I send my money to Tom Latham to stop this bat shit crazy bitch?
methinks we need to get a debate set up between her and Marriannette Miller-Meeks and proove to Iowa that this chica no comprende...
ReplyDeleteBetter an attack dog than a lapdog. Latham may be a nice guy, but he has been a loyal Bush foot soldier. He doesn't say crazy things like Steve King, but he votes the way the leadership wants him to. He has sold out the constitution by voting for the FISA legislation, and giving carte blanche for what used to be illegal eavesdropping on American citizens. And on energy issues, his heart is with the oil companies. But hey, if you love the last eight years and think the President and Congress have just done a swell job, by all means vote for him.
ReplyDeleteObama votes for fisa too. I guess he is also a lapdog.
ReplyDeleteI don't care what kind of credit card Obama voted for...
ReplyDeleteThat bitch is crazy.
Krusty, I'm telling you, this 4th District Conservative is staying home this year. Not only has Latham taken money from SEIU who will socialize medicine, it says on Project Vote Smart that he will support abortions in the case of rape and incest. I wonder how Kim Lehman and the Right to Lifers feel about that.
ReplyDeleteHey 4thdistcon,
ReplyDeleteYou're full of shit.
Conservatives aren't gonna stay home. That idea is more bat shit crazy than Latham's opponent.
DOHERTY: NEW SCIENTIFIC DATA JUSTIFIES REPEALING GLOBAL WARMING RESPONSE ACTBy bguhl - August 14, 2008 - 1:48pm
ReplyDeleteRelease Date: Aug 14 2008
DOHERTY: NEW SCIENTIFIC DATA JUSTIFIES REPEALING GLOBAL WARMING RESPONSE ACT
URGES STATE TO HOLD OFF ON DAMAGING NEW REGULATIONS AS CLIMATE CHANGE THEORIES CLASH
Responding to various new scientific reports questioning the concept of global warming, Assemblyman Michael Doherty today called on Governor Corzine to hold off on proposing any new regulations associated with the state’s Global Warming Response Act and urged the Legislature to repeal that act when it returns to legislative business after Labor Day.
“There are many credible members of the scientific community who have questioned the theory of global warming, and now we have some scientists actually suggesting the earth’s temperatures may be entering a period of dramatic cooling,” said Doherty, R-Warren and Hunterdon. “With this growing level of scientific uncertainty, it makes no sense to enact a new set of economically damaging regulations prompted by the global warming hysteria of recent years.”
The Global Warming Response Act was signed last year by Corzine, which requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050. The law required the state Department of Environmental Protection to release a report detailing how the state would meet the goals, with recommendations now expected to be issued this fall.
According to recent news reports, a top observatory that has been measuring sun spot activity predicts that global temperatures will drop by two degrees over the next 20 years as solar activity slows and the planet drastically cools down. They suggest this could potentially herald the onset of a new ice age. Following the end of the sun’s most active period in over 11,000 years, the last 10 years have displayed a clear cooling trend as temperatures post-1998 leveled out and are now decreasing.
Earlier this year, John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel, stated that manmade global warming is “the greatest scam in history,” adding, “I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a scam.” Coleman said the theory of global warming is based on fraudulent science.
“New Jersey’s tax and regulatory climate is already chasing jobs from this state left and right and these new regulations will make matters worse,” Doherty said. “Rather than conforming our policies to questionable scientific theories, we should be looking at the concrete economic indicators that show our state’s economy is in trouble. And we should be taking steps to help people who are losing jobs and being forced out of their homes by this state’s anti-economic growth agenda – not making matters worse.”
I have never heard of her. I dont, however like Latham. I dont believe that he does enough for new energy and I remember him voting no on a bill that would give a tax credit to people who use renewable energy.
ReplyDeleteI dont know who I will vote for but I am not content in "Just sticking with what I got". I know that a lot of Republicans dont much like Latham either.
Is there anyway we could get him a Primary challenger next time around? Maybe that lawyer from Marshalltown that ran against him in the primaries a few years back? Maybe Stu Iverson?
If Latham is truly the best representation we have why isnt he excepting invitations to a debate?
ReplyDelete